Amy Stevens vs Alana Subasic Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• How does Subasic perform on their second serve compared to Stevens? Subasic wins 35.45% of points, whereas Stevens manages 28.77%, giving Subasic a notable edge.
• Subasic shows stronger return skills, claiming 55.92% of opponent's second serve points, in contrast to Stevens' 49.02%.
• For first serve returns, Subasic again leads with 36.92% compared to Stevens' 30.88%, indicating superior return abilities.
• Stevens excels under pressure, saving 53.13% of breakpoints, which is superior to Subasic's 42.77%.
• Both players have close match win percentages over the last year, with Subasic at 55% and Stevens closely behind at 53.85%.
• Notably, Subasic's best surface performance is on Hard courts with a 57% win rate, while Stevens also prefers Hard but at 54%.
• Subasic has been more successful in lower-tier $10K tournaments, winning 71.43%, whereas Stevens has a 53.85% success rate at the same level.
• Stevens has faced more challenging competition, with opponents averaging a rank of 69.15, compared to Subasic's competitors at an average rank of 398.
• In deciding sets, Stevens demonstrates resilience with a 60% success rate, surpassing Subasic's 38%.
• Break point conversion is efficient for Stevens at 42.86%, slightly trumping Subasic's 37.19%, an important factor in close matches.

Editorial Prediction (August 16, 2025, UTC):

Subasic exhibits superior serving and returning abilities, as indicated by recent form statistics. Their effectiveness on second serves and return games grants them a statistical edge over Stevens, especially on Subasic's favored Hard courts.

However, Stevens has demonstrated strong pressure handling, shown by their high breakpoint save percentage and superior break point conversion. Their toughness is also reflected in their performance in deciding sets, suggesting resilience and persistence under match-deciding conditions.

Taking into consideration the tougher competition Stevens has faced, their ability to secure win percentages against higher-ranked players implies a seasoned approach to matches of this caliber.

Weighing all factors, including current form and opponent quality, Stevens appears to have a slight overall advantage in this matchup, making them the likely winner.